When was the last time you were at an “offsite” and your eyes glazed over at an agenda overloaded with speakers, action items, and activities? Were the objectives accomplished? Did you even know what they were? Was there any down time or was it just a PowerPoint marathon? Since your time together is limited – not to mention expensive – your offsite needs to make efficient use of the brain power in the room and accomplish the primary objectives: decision-making and problem-solving.
Here are some tips that will help your next offsite go from good to great:
• Figure out the right agenda topics. In advance, send participants an anonymous survey of 8 to 12 questions: 4-6 questions should ask participants to rate the company’s/team’s effectiveness on specific issues. Use a 1-5 scale. Remaining questions should be open-ended to solicit their viewpoints on major issues. The survey results will point you at least three of the offsite’s top agenda topics.
Create specific agenda topics (“Should we buy Company A?”). If topics are too broad (“the budget” or “mergers”), people come to the offsite with their own interpretations of the topics and you waste time getting everyone on the same page.
• Identify the right attendees. Remember why you’re hosting the meeting – it’s to make decisions, not keep everyone updated (which you can do in more-efficient, less-expensive ways). If an individual is not a decision–maker, seriously consider keeping his/her name off the invitation list. Decisions are seldom finalized with groups larger than 8 people. If the goal of the offsite is simply idea sharing and brainstorming, a larger group of 25-30 makes sense.
• Find a good facilitator. The facilitator will make sure no one, including you the host, dominates the meeting, and all voices are heard. Consider an outside facilitator to help take the stress off you and other participants and ensure timing and flow. You should also have a recorder to document the proceedings and especially the decisions made. (This is not the same person as the facilitator, and not one of the participants.)
• Send out agenda and pre-work in advance. Think of your offsite as you would a board of directors meeting. Prior to a board meeting, directors should receive a package of information so that they come prepared to make decisions, not sit through a day of presentations.
Assign each agenda issue to a participant, who’s responsible for presenting a summary of the issue at the off-site in under 5 minutes. This summary is not an opportunity for the executive to show everything he/she knows about a subject; anything that can be included in a PowerPoint presentation or a memo should be distributed and read prior to the meeting.
• Dine together the evening prior. As your participants congregate the night before the offsite, plan an informal meal to allow them to relax, reconnect and socialize. If they’re traveling to join you, this is even more important. Casually field questions and set the stage for the next day or two. This scheduled downtime in the evening will ensure a more business-focused and productive team at the start of your meeting the following day.
• Enlist upper management to kick off your meeting. A concise 5-15 minute launch from upper management or a critical influencer establishes the sense of urgency, gravitas and support for your agenda. Suggest key points for them to keep their message relevant to your mission and how it supports larger goals within the organization. Upper management can’t come? Consider a video address or have a representative read his/her presentation.
• Establish – and respect – the ground rules. This should be a no-brainer, but you’d be surprised how many offsites get bogged down or derailed by small professional discourtesies. Cell phones and other electronic devices should be turned off or set to vibrate, and interruptions only allowed in emergency situations. Remember confidentiality, courtesy and respect at all times. The facilitator can keep you honest here.
• Stick to a timed agenda. You need to be strict with your time. Don’t think in terms of morning and afternoon sessions. Break each agenda topic into segments of 45-90 minutes. Because people grow tired or distracted and become less effective during longer sessions, give ample time for breaks. Don’t skimp on a lunch break; it offers a great opportunity for building relationships in less formal settings. To avoid being sidetracked, use the “parking lot” approach for issues that are important, but not pertinent to the agenda issue under discussion.
Strategically breakout, brainstorm and report back. For larger groups, the 80/20 rule works well here. Allow 20% of a segment for the problem overview: this may be the 5-minute summary mentioned above. Assign smaller breakout groups to convene and develop solutions over the remaining 80% of the segment. Allot time for the teams to report back.
Tackle a tough, significant business challenge first, while the team is still fresh. Downsizing, budgeting, operational issues fit well here. Resist the temptation to impose brain-numbing status reports or updates on an energetic atmosphere. Harness the brainpower you’ve assembled.
Take on a broader topic or challenge in the afternoon. Issues such as cultural change, talent retention, recruitment or shareholder perceptions are best addressed in the lunch when people are more relaxed but (if you’ve done your job) a bit taxed by the issues of the morning.
• Factor in informal networking; (ie Fun). Make sure to balance business time with social and networking time. It is a good idea to have some kind of social interaction – a dinner, a golf, teambuilding exercises, etc. Give your participants the time to enjoy their destination and time together. Making decisions and problem-solving might be the main objectives, but never ignore the power of enjoyment and the valuable business insights that come with it.
The successful offsite or retreat is a carefully orchestrated blend of structure and discipline combined with an environment to stimulate creativity, dialog and synergies for maximum results.
The Nyman Group has organized, lead and facilitated retreats for leading clients worldwide. Read more about Nyman Group’s approach to leadership and off-site retreats.
]]>According to recent studies (several are cited in The Atlantic’s August 2010 cover article, The End of Men,” by Hanna Rosin) women now make up a majority of the U.S. workforce, hold more than half of all managerial and professional jobs, and earn nearly 60% of bachelor’s and master’s degrees and 42% of all MBAs.
These changes in the makeup of the U.S. workforce couldn’t come at a better time for businesses still coming to grips with the recession. There’s a growing trend among companies battered by one-too-many risky business ventures to seek out executives who, along with solid technical expertise and business savvy, possess what has traditionally been considered a strength among women executives -- strong persuasion and influence skills. While not exactly asking executives to develop a “softer” side, companies are less interested in leaders who assume total control and take all the risks; the emphasis now is on executives who are mentors, consensus-builders, coaches and collaborators.
This isn’t a new concept. Ten years ago, Jim Collins’s “Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap . . . And Others Don’t” suggested that great leaders – what Collins called Level 5 leaders – were those who combined personal humility with an intense professional will. These leaders focused on people first, strategy and vision second.
Traditionally, women have been promoted within their departments and divisions because they possess a solid work ethic, and have the knowledge and drive to get the job done. That gets them only so far, though. What propels women into senior management positions that span the organization are their finely tuned persuasion and influencing skills.
Women executives need to take advantage of their natural communications skills and social intelligence so that they can make level-headed decisions that, more often than not, are reached through collaboration.
Persuading and Influencing
You may have earned a reputation as the go-to person who understands the business and makes things happen. Now, though, as a leader, you need to step back. Instead of issuing directives, you need to question, probe, and understand, so that you are better able to foster a spirit of collaboration.
Thanks to a changing workforce and new post-recession strategies, there’s a new playing field out there. The powers of persuasion and influence – long considered women’s traditional strengths -- have never been more in demand.
Nyman Group delivers workshops and programs that can help you and your team achieve effective persuasion and influence with others, with the minimal level of conflict.
]]>Among the suggestions for leaders facing this challenge:
For the full article in Life Science Leader, please visit:
http://www.lifescienceleader.com/index.php?option=com_jambozine&layout=article&view=page&aid=4055
First the good news: with recession fears subsiding and your business outlook brightening, you're now ready to rebuild or revitalize your leadership team with some fresh blood. And now the not-so-good news: finding the best person to fill a key leadership position is never an easy task.
A wrong hiring decision can have far-reaching impact on you, your leadership team, your employees and your shareholders. A good hire, on the other hand, could help propel your company from your current survive mode and into a thrive mode.
Here are a few tips to help you find the right person for the right seat on the bus:
As the economic picture brightens, you must anticipate what you need to stay ahead of the curve to achieve a competitive advantage. A new, post-recession business environment calls for new thinking, which includes the right leadership team. Take an active role in the selection of new executives you are expecting to help accomplish your business plan. Finally, here are a Nyman Group's recommendations for five great interview questions...
Five Great Interview Questions
These are for illustrative purposes only, but you can see how answers to these questions would help you dig deeper than the standard (dare we even say, stale) interview questions.
]]>
In the epic political battle over health care, the New York Times offers a glimpse at the level of maneuvering that took place to achieve President Obama’s agenda:
“The Democratic effort to secure the 216 votes needed for passage of the legislation came together only after last-minute negotiations involving the White House, the House leadership and a group of Democratic opponents of abortion rights…”
National politics or corporate politics, Nyman Group offers its perspective on the seven things leaders can do to gather the support of the rank and file, especially in behind-the-scenes negotiations:
]]>
Nyman Group has our own “take” on coaching. For more information about our perspective on this important topic, please visit: Executive Coaching.
(* Fast Company, “Coaching: The Fad That Won’t Go Away,” Jim Bolt, April 10, 2006)
]]>The article was an interview with Dr. Christopher Musselwhite, creator of the “Change Style Indicator,” a tool based on data from 100,000 people. According to Dr. Musselwhite, people fall into one of three change style types: conservers, originators, and pragmatists. Check out the article — which one are you?
While the interview is now about a year old, change management seems to be even more important these days — especially in a number of industries such as financial, health care, and automotive. From our standpoint at Nyman Group, the underlying denominator here is AMBIGUITY. While there is no certain roadmap for success when it comes to leading in periods of unprecedented change, we believe that the most successful leaders are able to leverage uncertainty to their advantage.
]]>Although women in diplomatic circles are still a minority group, the newspaper points out that there are now 25 female ambassadors in Washington, the highest number ever, citing the high level of visibility of leadership role models such as Hillary Clinton. Because of Clinton’s role in women’s rights issues internationally, other nations are finding it easier (and possibly wiser) to appoint more women to diplomatic roles in their dealings with Washington.
The role of women is changing in circles outside Washington as well. Nyman Group’s piece on coaching for women in traditionally conservative law firms may be of interest to you.
]]>